<p>FEATURES<br />
Provides a comprehensive guide to the remedies available to litigants in public law from the common remedies available in judicial review, remedies under the Human Rights Act 1998 for breach of Convention rights to those which are used less often, such as habeas corpus.<br />
Deals with the current scope, procedure and practice of judicial review and other public law remedies.<br />
Introductory sections consider the situations in which judicial review is available followed by chapters dealing with the legal consequences of a successful judicial review application.<br />
Details the full range of remedies available, from prerogative remedies, declaratory relief (declaring what the legal position is or what the rights of the parties are), injunctions (injunctions may be used to stop a public body from acting unlawfully by exceeding its statutory public law powers) to habeas corpus.<br />
Deals in full with the procedures for bringing a claim of judicial review under the Civil Procedure Rules and the Human Rights Act 1998.<br />
Includes description and analysis of changes to public law and remedies as a result of the departure of the United Kingdom from the European Union and an analysis of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018<br />
Changes in practice and procedure, in relation to the rules on time-limits, costs capping orders, cross-examination and disclosure are covered<br />
Provides analysis of the scope of the discretion of the court to refuse remedies.<br />
Deals with the changes in relation to appeals and statutory applications in the planning field<br />
Thorough and comprehensive legal analysis with an accessible approach is provided throughout<br />
Practical treatment of the subject matters, outlining the relevant procedures from start to finish, guiding readers through the options at each stage<br />
Written by a Court of Appeal Judge regarded as a leading authority on administrative law and judicial review. Prior to appointment as a judge, the author was a respected practitioner who was appointed a QC 2006 and, prior to practice, had been an academic lawyer.<br />
Authoritative commentary which can be relied upon for accuracy and acumen</p>
